Loading
Choose the perfect plan for your next mobile app, website, UI/UX design, or AI model project. All plans include modern tech stack and expert developers.
Perfect for small businesses needing a professional website or basic mobile app.
Get QuoteIdeal for businesses needing full-featured mobile apps or custom web platforms.
Get QuoteFor enterprises needing custom AI models, LLM integration, and advanced development.
Contact SalesWeb & Mobile Apps
Native iOS/Android
AI & ML Models
UI/UX Design
Backend APIs
Database Design
Cloud Deployment
Cross-platform Apps
| Feature / Service | Starter Web | Professional | AI Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Website Development | |||
| Mobile App (iOS/Android) | |||
| Premium UI/UX Design | |||
| Admin Dashboard / CMS | |||
| Custom AI Model Integration | |||
| LLM / ChatGPT Integration | |||
| Payment Gateway | Extra | ||
| Post-Launch Support | 1 Month | 3 Months | 12 Months |
| Source Code Ownership |
Packages are a starting point, not a quote. Here is the arithmetic underneath them, so you can tell a fair price from a misleading one — including on quotes that are not ours.
Strip away the packaging and almost every price in this industry is estimated hours × blended day rate + third-party costs + risk buffer. Packages, "starter plans" and per-page pricing are that same calculation with the working hidden.
The blended day rate is the average cost of everyone who touches the work: a designer, one or two engineers, a QA tester, and a project manager who is probably splitting time across several accounts. Established studios in Pakistan bill somewhere between roughly PKR 18,000 and PKR 45,000 per developer-day in 2026. Independent freelancers go lower, and the difference is usually not skill — it is what surrounds the code: design review, testing, deployment, documentation, and someone who answers the phone in eighteen months.
Where clients are surprised is the hours, not the rate. A screen described in one sentence — "users can see their order history" — is a list view, an empty state, a loading state, pagination, a detail view, a filter, an error state, a permission check, an API endpoint, a database index and a test. That is two to four developer-days, not two hours.
| Model | Best when | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed price | Scope is genuinely clear and stable | Carries a 20–30% risk premium, and the scope document is enforced strictly — because it is the only thing protecting our margin |
| Time & materials | The product will evolve and you can stay engaged | Cheaper per unit of work, but drifts if you cannot give feedback weekly |
| Monthly retainer | Ongoing maintenance and small improvements | Define included hours and response times, or expectations diverge |
| Paid discovery, then fixed price | Anything ambiguous — our default | Feels like an extra step; it is the cheapest stage of the project |
That last row is what we propose most often. Five to ten days producing wireframes, a technical approach and a firm build quote. Clients occasionally resist paying for discovery, and it is genuinely the cheapest money in a project: it is the only phase where changing your mind costs a conversation instead of a sprint. The document is yours either way.
Ask about every one of these before signing anything, with us or anyone else:
When two quotes for the same brief differ by four times, the gap is almost never efficiency. It is one of four things. Smaller scope — one platform, no admin panel, no testing, no deployment, with everything else arriving later as change requests at a higher effective rate. No QA, which is 15–25% of a professional build; removing it does not remove the bugs, it moves their discovery to your customers. Junior-only staffing, which is fine for well-defined work under review and expensive when nobody senior is making the architecture decisions you cannot cheaply reverse. Or no handover — no documentation, no repository access, no deployment credentials — so the next team's first month is spent understanding what exists.
The most expensive project we have been involved in was quoted at PKR 400,000. It was abandoned at around 70% and the rebuild cost several times the original, of which a substantial share was spent purely on understanding and untangling the first attempt.
Ask all your shortlisted studios for the same five things. The answers separate them faster than the prices will: a breakdown in days per phase rather than a single number; who specifically will do the work, at what seniority, and how much of their week you get; what is explicitly out of scope, since the exclusions list is more informative than the inclusions; the IP and repository terms, where you should own the code and hold admin access from day one; and the post-launch arrangement quoted before you sign rather than after you depend on them.
Our own answers to all five are published — see how to hire a development team without getting burned, and then use every question in it on us.
Ranges are useful for budgeting and useless for deciding. The fastest route to an actual figure is a short conversation about what you are building, who uses it, and what has to be true on launch day. We will tell you the range, what drives it, and — genuinely — if we think an off-the-shelf product would serve you better than anything we would build. That answer has cost us work before and it remains the right one.
For the full arithmetic, including a phase-by-phase breakdown of a two-platform app with payments, see what software development actually costs in Pakistan.